AI as Biology: Why Thinking Like a Gardener Beats Engineering for Enterprise ROI
Investment in AI has been tremendous, but it seems the promised returns haven't been realized. Organizations expect $3.71 in return for every dollar invested in generative AI according to KPMG's AI Quarterly Pulse Survey. 70% of leaders are planning investments between $50 million and $250 million per the AmplifAI 2025 Industry Report. But the reality? Enterprise-wide AI initiatives achieve only 5.9% ROI against 10% capital investment. And remarkably, none of the surveyed organizations report achieving their expected returns yet according to KPMG's Q1 2025 findings.
Perhaps this is related to the way that most companies approach AI. We treat AI like traditional software, something to be engineered, built, deployed. But AI doesn't work that way. Neural networks aren't assembled; they're grown. They evolve, learn, and adapt like biological organisms. The companies achieving breakthrough results understand this fundamental truth: when you shift from thinking like an engineer to thinking like a gardener - from building to cultivating - the 90% failure rate becomes a growth opportunity. This biological lens isn't just a metaphor; it's the key to understanding why most AI projects fail and how to make yours succeed. Let's start with how AI actually develops.
Growing Neural Networks Like Plants
Consider machine learning models. They aren't perfectly deterministic, if/then style code implementations. Neural networks are "grown" like a cultured plant or tree. The researcher provides it the right data, configures the objective functions, tunes the hyperparameters, just like someone growing a plant would treat the soil, provide water, ensure the plant has the right amount of sunlight.
Approaching AI like biology is not a novel view. Many experts in the field approach AI in this way. But we're not really acting on this insight in our enterprises.
Take Anthropic's recent mechanistic interpretability research. They talk about how the tools of neurobiology are incredibly useful when trying to understand AI. They're using what they call "microscopes" to study neural networks, discovering biological-like structures in AI models. Features forming circuits similar to biological neural organization. Millions of concepts emerging naturally (not programmed). In their June 2024 paper "Mapping the Mind of a Large Language Model," they achieved what they describe as the "first ever detailed look inside a modern, production-grade large language model," extracting millions of interpretable features from Claude Sonnet.
Chris Olah, co-founder of Anthropic and pioneer in neural network interpretability, puts it well: "Analogies to biology often suggest looking more closely at the details and internal structure of neural networks."
Contrast the Traditional Engineering Approach and Biological Approach
IBM's research captures the problem perfectly: "People said, 'Step one: we're going to use LLMs. Step two: What should we use them for?'...Achieving positive ROI on an AI transformation requires the inverse approach." The engineering mindset starts with the tool and searches for applications, exactly what the Critical 7 framework identifies as a strategic approach failure that contributes to the 90% project failure rate. The gardener starts with the environment and lets solutions emerge.
The energy requirements alone reveal the mismatch. Conventional AI requires massive datasets, high-performance GPUs, and cloud-based infrastructures. Meanwhile, biological systems achieve extraordinary feats with minimal energy expenditure, a lesson in efficiency we're only beginning to appreciate.
Evidence from the Field: Mechanistic Interpretability and Multi-Agent Evolution
The Anthropic research on mechanistic interpretability is fascinating. They're using techniques from neurobiology that are actually more effective on AI than biological brains, with the advantage of thousands of models vs. rare surgical opportunities and controlled experiments with complete neural observation. They've discovered features forming circuits remarkably similar to biological neural organization. Millions of concepts emerging naturally through exposure to data: grown, not programmed.
The EvoAgent paper and evolutionary multi-agent research shows this in action. Automatic evolution of specialized agents through mutation, crossover, and selection generates diverse configurations no engineer could have designed. Environmental pressures drive specialization, just like Darwin's finches. AI models using these biological principles show dramatic improvements: 4-fold performance increases on challenging biology tests, outperforming human experts by 2x in specialized domains. This isn't metaphorical. It's measurable.
Synthetic Social Ecosystems as Development Substrate
The traditional, mechanistic, waterfall approach to AI is inefficient and misses all the complexity of work tasks and does not take advantage of the ability for agents to learn. The best way to get the performance and adaptability while minimizing risks is to grow your agent workflows, tools, and more within a simulated environment.
Research on synthetic persona simulation is showing complex artificial personalities with detailed psychological profiles. "Alive" profiles that can be interviewed and observed at scale. Infinite scale, controlled variability, consistent availability.
The Sotopia framework enables complex social interactions between agents. Role-playing scenarios with coordination, collaboration, competition. Non-omniscient interactions requiring social inference. Meanwhile, AgentSociety research demonstrates thousands of agents with millions of interactions. Realistic societal environments with economic dynamics. Social lives emerging from agent interactions.
The AgentCompany eval provides complete organizational simulations as breeding grounds. This is where it gets real.
Enterprise Reality: How a Biological Approach Solves Deployment Challenges
Many of the challenges with getting the benefit and efficiencies from AI come from treating it like software projects rather than the flexible, non-deterministic systems they are.
The Pilot Purgatory Problem
The Blend 360 Critical 7 framework gives us the numbers: 90% of AI projects never reach production. There's this massive gap between potential and practical business value. Traditional engineering approaches are failing at scale due to the dynamic and non-deterministic nature of AI and agents.
Biological Solutions to Deployment Barriers
You are training agents, not building them. This is the key insight.
Strategy alignment through ecosystem integration. Data as living substrate vs. managed resource. Evolutionary infrastructure vs. static hosting. Organic adoption vs. forced change management. Demonstrated reliability through evolutionary trust-building.
85% of AI leaders cite data quality as their biggest obstacle according to KPMG's implementation research. But here's the thing, biological systems treat messy, real-world data as evolutionary pressure that strengthens robustness. They don't need perfect, pre-cleaned datasets.
From Workflows to Ecosystems
Current Limitations of Workflow-Based Agents
These constraints dissolve when we shift to biological thinking - to thinking like gardeners rather than engineers.
Simulation-First Development
TheAgentCompany benchmark research shows the way forward. Complete organizational simulations as breeding grounds. Safe experimentation environments. Scenario-driven growth vs. workflow programming.
Evolutionary Agent Development
AI as Biology Implementation Framework
Simulation Infrastructure Requirements
Rich social ecosystems with diverse synthetic personas. Realistic professional environments with authentic tools. Dynamic scenario generation capabilities. Multi-modal interaction support.
New Development Methodologies
Environmental design vs. explicit programming. Observational science vs. specification-driven development. Ecosystem dynamics understanding. Selective pressure design for beneficial evolution.
Teams become observational scientists studying their digital gardens rather than specification writers trying to engineer outcomes.
Safety Through Biological Understanding
Stanford's NeuroAI research makes an important point: "Humans are the only known agents capable of general intelligence that can perform robustly even in unfamiliar situations." This gives us a proven blueprint for safer AI development.
Anthropic's interpretability research enables internal mechanism understanding for safety interventions. Behavioral testing in synthetic environments. Stress testing in safe simulated conditions. When we understand AI as an organism rather than a machine, we can identify and address problems before they manifest in production.
Business Implications
Competitive Advantages
The biological approach - the gardener's approach - creates sustainable, scalable AI value. Exponential vs. linear growth patterns. While engineering approaches show linear improvement with investment, biological systems exhibit exponential growth. Each successful adaptation becomes the foundation for further evolution.
Natural alignment with business objectives happens through environmental pressures. Continuous innovation as emergent property.
Neuromorphic systems demonstrate this efficiency, using orders of magnitude less power by processing only relevant spikes. They learn continuously in real-time, adapting dynamically without retraining.
Organizational Changes
This requires ecological thinking vs. engineering mindset. New skill requirements - you need people who understand biology/ecology principles, not just computer science. Gradual capability development vs. big-bang deployments. Trust building through demonstrated reliability.
As Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, puts it: "The progress of the underlying technology is inexorable, driven by forces too powerful to stop, but the way in which it happens...are eminently possible to change, and it's possible to have great positive impact by doing so."
Future Directions
Technology Evolution
We're going to see more advanced simulation platforms. More sophisticated synthetic personas. Better evolutionary algorithms for agent development. Improved interpretability tools.
Industry Transformation
Moving beyond pilot purgatory. Sustainable competitive advantage through AI ecosystems. Industry-wide adoption of biological approaches. New standards for AI development and deployment.
The Biological Future: Let your Garden Grow
The paradigm shift from engineering to biology - from engineer to gardener - is key to AI value realization. We need to work with AI's natural evolutionary tendencies. This creates sustainable, exponential value creation. It's going to transform the industry through ecosystem thinking.
Nature has already solved many of the challenges that AI faces today. We're just now learning to apply these principles to create a new generation of AI that evolves, rather than just computes.
The question isn't whether thinking like a gardener will transform AI implementation, but how quickly organizations will adapt their mental models. Those who recognize AI's organic nature, who approach it as gardeners rather than engineers, will define the next era of enterprise technology. The future belongs to those who can cultivate artificial intelligence rather than trying to construct it.
References:
AI as Biology: Why Thinking Like a Gardener Beats Engineering for Enterprise ROI
Investment in AI has been tremendous, but it seems the promised returns haven't been realized. Organizations expect $3.71 in return for every dollar invested in generative AI according to KPMG's AI Quarterly Pulse Survey. 70% of leaders are planning investments between $50 million and $250 million per the AmplifAI 2025 Industry Report. But the reality? Enterprise-wide AI initiatives achieve only 5.9% ROI against 10% capital investment. And remarkably, none of the surveyed organizations report achieving their expected returns yet according to KPMG's Q1 2025 findings.
Perhaps this is related to the way that most companies approach AI. We treat AI like traditional software, something to be engineered, built, deployed. But AI doesn't work that way. Neural networks aren't assembled; they're grown. They evolve, learn, and adapt like biological organisms. The companies achieving breakthrough results understand this fundamental truth: when you shift from thinking like an engineer to thinking like a gardener - from building to cultivating - the 90% failure rate becomes a growth opportunity. This biological lens isn't just a metaphor; it's the key to understanding why most AI projects fail and how to make yours succeed. Let's start with how AI actually develops.
Growing Neural Networks Like Plants
Consider machine learning models. They aren't perfectly deterministic, if/then style code implementations. Neural networks are "grown" like a cultured plant or tree. The researcher provides it the right data, configures the objective functions, tunes the hyperparameters, just like someone growing a plant would treat the soil, provide water, ensure the plant has the right amount of sunlight.
Approaching AI like biology is not a novel view. Many experts in the field approach AI in this way. But we're not really acting on this insight in our enterprises.
Take Anthropic's recent mechanistic interpretability research. They talk about how the tools of neurobiology are incredibly useful when trying to understand AI. They're using what they call "microscopes" to study neural networks, discovering biological-like structures in AI models. Features forming circuits similar to biological neural organization. Millions of concepts emerging naturally (not programmed). In their June 2024 paper "Mapping the Mind of a Large Language Model," they achieved what they describe as the "first ever detailed look inside a modern, production-grade large language model," extracting millions of interpretable features from Claude Sonnet.
Chris Olah, co-founder of Anthropic and pioneer in neural network interpretability, puts it well: "Analogies to biology often suggest looking more closely at the details and internal structure of neural networks."
Contrast the Traditional Engineering Approach and Biological Approach
IBM's research captures the problem perfectly: "People said, 'Step one: we're going to use LLMs. Step two: What should we use them for?'...Achieving positive ROI on an AI transformation requires the inverse approach." The engineering mindset starts with the tool and searches for applications, exactly what the Critical 7 framework identifies as a strategic approach failure that contributes to the 90% project failure rate. The gardener starts with the environment and lets solutions emerge.
The energy requirements alone reveal the mismatch. Conventional AI requires massive datasets, high-performance GPUs, and cloud-based infrastructures. Meanwhile, biological systems achieve extraordinary feats with minimal energy expenditure, a lesson in efficiency we're only beginning to appreciate.
Evidence from the Field: Mechanistic Interpretability and Multi-Agent Evolution
The Anthropic research on mechanistic interpretability is fascinating. They're using techniques from neurobiology that are actually more effective on AI than biological brains, with the advantage of thousands of models vs. rare surgical opportunities and controlled experiments with complete neural observation. They've discovered features forming circuits remarkably similar to biological neural organization. Millions of concepts emerging naturally through exposure to data: grown, not programmed.
The EvoAgent paper and evolutionary multi-agent research shows this in action. Automatic evolution of specialized agents through mutation, crossover, and selection generates diverse configurations no engineer could have designed. Environmental pressures drive specialization, just like Darwin's finches. AI models using these biological principles show dramatic improvements: 4-fold performance increases on challenging biology tests, outperforming human experts by 2x in specialized domains. This isn't metaphorical. It's measurable.
Synthetic Social Ecosystems as Development Substrate
The traditional, mechanistic, waterfall approach to AI is inefficient and misses all the complexity of work tasks and does not take advantage of the ability for agents to learn. The best way to get the performance and adaptability while minimizing risks is to grow your agent workflows, tools, and more within a simulated environment.
Research on synthetic persona simulation is showing complex artificial personalities with detailed psychological profiles. "Alive" profiles that can be interviewed and observed at scale. Infinite scale, controlled variability, consistent availability.
The Sotopia framework enables complex social interactions between agents. Role-playing scenarios with coordination, collaboration, competition. Non-omniscient interactions requiring social inference. Meanwhile, AgentSociety research demonstrates thousands of agents with millions of interactions. Realistic societal environments with economic dynamics. Social lives emerging from agent interactions.
The AgentCompany eval provides complete organizational simulations as breeding grounds. This is where it gets real.
Enterprise Reality: How a Biological Approach Solves Deployment Challenges
Many of the challenges with getting the benefit and efficiencies from AI come from treating it like software projects rather than the flexible, non-deterministic systems they are.
The Pilot Purgatory Problem
The Blend 360 Critical 7 framework gives us the numbers: 90% of AI projects never reach production. There's this massive gap between potential and practical business value. Traditional engineering approaches are failing at scale due to the dynamic and non-deterministic nature of AI and agents.
Biological Solutions to Deployment Barriers
You are training agents, not building them. This is the key insight.
Strategy alignment through ecosystem integration. Data as living substrate vs. managed resource. Evolutionary infrastructure vs. static hosting. Organic adoption vs. forced change management. Demonstrated reliability through evolutionary trust-building.
85% of AI leaders cite data quality as their biggest obstacle according to KPMG's implementation research. But here's the thing, biological systems treat messy, real-world data as evolutionary pressure that strengthens robustness. They don't need perfect, pre-cleaned datasets.
From Workflows to Ecosystems
Current Limitations of Workflow-Based Agents
These constraints dissolve when we shift to biological thinking - to thinking like gardeners rather than engineers.
Simulation-First Development
TheAgentCompany benchmark research shows the way forward. Complete organizational simulations as breeding grounds. Safe experimentation environments. Scenario-driven growth vs. workflow programming.
Evolutionary Agent Development
AI as Biology Implementation Framework
Simulation Infrastructure Requirements
Rich social ecosystems with diverse synthetic personas. Realistic professional environments with authentic tools. Dynamic scenario generation capabilities. Multi-modal interaction support.
New Development Methodologies
Environmental design vs. explicit programming. Observational science vs. specification-driven development. Ecosystem dynamics understanding. Selective pressure design for beneficial evolution.
Teams become observational scientists studying their digital gardens rather than specification writers trying to engineer outcomes.
Safety Through Biological Understanding
Stanford's NeuroAI research makes an important point: "Humans are the only known agents capable of general intelligence that can perform robustly even in unfamiliar situations." This gives us a proven blueprint for safer AI development.
Anthropic's interpretability research enables internal mechanism understanding for safety interventions. Behavioral testing in synthetic environments. Stress testing in safe simulated conditions. When we understand AI as an organism rather than a machine, we can identify and address problems before they manifest in production.
Business Implications
Competitive Advantages
The biological approach - the gardener's approach - creates sustainable, scalable AI value. Exponential vs. linear growth patterns. While engineering approaches show linear improvement with investment, biological systems exhibit exponential growth. Each successful adaptation becomes the foundation for further evolution.
Natural alignment with business objectives happens through environmental pressures. Continuous innovation as emergent property.
Neuromorphic systems demonstrate this efficiency, using orders of magnitude less power by processing only relevant spikes. They learn continuously in real-time, adapting dynamically without retraining.
Organizational Changes
This requires ecological thinking vs. engineering mindset. New skill requirements - you need people who understand biology/ecology principles, not just computer science. Gradual capability development vs. big-bang deployments. Trust building through demonstrated reliability.
As Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, puts it: "The progress of the underlying technology is inexorable, driven by forces too powerful to stop, but the way in which it happens...are eminently possible to change, and it's possible to have great positive impact by doing so."
Future Directions
Technology Evolution
We're going to see more advanced simulation platforms. More sophisticated synthetic personas. Better evolutionary algorithms for agent development. Improved interpretability tools.
Industry Transformation
Moving beyond pilot purgatory. Sustainable competitive advantage through AI ecosystems. Industry-wide adoption of biological approaches. New standards for AI development and deployment.
The Biological Future: Let your Garden Grow
The paradigm shift from engineering to biology - from engineer to gardener - is key to AI value realization. We need to work with AI's natural evolutionary tendencies. This creates sustainable, exponential value creation. It's going to transform the industry through ecosystem thinking.
Nature has already solved many of the challenges that AI faces today. We're just now learning to apply these principles to create a new generation of AI that evolves, rather than just computes.
The question isn't whether thinking like a gardener will transform AI implementation, but how quickly organizations will adapt their mental models. Those who recognize AI's organic nature, who approach it as gardeners rather than engineers, will define the next era of enterprise technology. The future belongs to those who can cultivate artificial intelligence rather than trying to construct it.
References:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Sit sit vel eu sed proin. Arcu bibendum in mauris urna erat magna volutpat eget. Lectus commodo consectetur egestas quis ut lobortis nunc.
.png)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Sit sit vel eu sed proin. Arcu bibendum in mauris urna erat magna volutpat eget. Lectus commodo consectetur egestas quis ut lobortis nunc.
.png)
.jpeg)
